When many people think about "learning", they think about
courses, workshops, online courses, etc - in other words formal
learning. However, in recent years it has become common practice to
describe learning as being either "formal" or "informal". What is the difference between the two?
Formal v informal learning
Jay Cross,
the leading proponent of the term "informal learning",
explains
the difference between formal and informal learning in this posting on
Informal Learning 2.0
on his blog (8 August 2009):
"Learning is formal when someone other than the learner sets
curriculum. Typically, it’s an event, on a schedule and completion
is generally recognized with a symbol, such as a grade, gold star,
certificate or check mark in a learning management system. Formal
learning is pushed on learners.
By contrast, informal learners usually set their own
learning objectives. They learn when they feel a need to know.
The proof of their learning is their ability to do something
they could not do before. Informal learning often is a pastiche
of small chunks of observing how others do things, asking
questions, trial and error, sharing stories with others and
casual conversation. Learners are pulled to informal learning"

In
his seminar book on
Informal Learning, Jay
also points
to the mismatch between the amount of informal learning that takes
place in an organisation and the amount spent on formal learning.
The "80-20" meme is often quoted, that is. that 80% of all learning that takes
place in an organisation is informal, yet it’s the 20% (the
formal part) where most training departments concentrate their
efforts. A number of people have questioned these numbers, so here
are Jay's thoughts on where this
80% meme came from.
Although there is a lot of value in differentiating
learning in this way - formal and informal, because it helps to
explain that learning doesn't just take place in a classroom or when
taking a formal course, the two terms
have now become rather confused, mis-used, and even abused, e.g.
- Josh Bersin,
suggested that the importance of informal learning within corporates
is now being recognised, in a posting, entitled
Informal learning becomes formal.
- Vendors are now trying to market their products using these
new buzzwords, so we see promotions for systems that will
"manage informal learning information" - which is clearly a
contradiction in terms.
There is a need to be more specific about where and how learning
takes place. When analysing examples of use of social media in
learning, I identified 5 different ways that social media can be used within a
learning context.
5 categories of learning
- FSL - Formal Structured Learning - formal education and training
like classes, courses, workshops, etc - both synchronous and
asynchronous - which is pushed to the learner.
- PDL - Personal Directed Learning - individuals
organising and managing their own personal or
professional learning -
that is access and use of both information and instruction to
address their own learning and performance problems.
- GDL - Group Directed Learning - groups of individuals
coming together, e.g. in work teams, on project or in
study groups -
to share information, resources, experiences, for example. Or just two people
working together in a coaching
and mentoring capacity.
- IOL - Intra-Organisational Learning - for
organisations there is the bigger picture, where employees share
information and resources with the whole organisation, and keep
each other up to date and up
to speed on strategic and other internal initiatives and activities
- ASL - Accidental & Serendipitous Learning -
individuals learning without consciously
realising it (aka incidental or random learning)
(Social) learning activity therefore take many forms within an
organisation, as the following diagram shows ..
